主要将《中国药典》2010年版(ChP 2010)收入的甘草质量标准与欧洲药典(EP 8.0)、美国药典(USP 37)和日本药典(JP 16)3部药典中甘草的质量标准进行对比分析,并对含量、重金属、农药残留、赭曲霉素A等几项主要指标的限量标准进行了比较,了解《中国药典》中甘草的质量标准和其他3部药典的异同,使中药材质量标准向国际标准靠拢,以适应国际需求.

In this paper, the quality standards of licorice in Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP 2010) were compared with those in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP 8.0), United States Pharmacopeia (USP 37), and Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP 16), and several main indicators such as content, heavy metals, pesticide residues, ochratoxin A, and other limits were compared with the other three pharmacopoeias, so as to understand the similarities and differences between the quality standards of licorice in ChP 2010 and the three other pharmacopoeias. As a result, traditional Chinese medicine quality standards could get closer to international standards to meet international demand.